Salt Lake Tribune article about Mr. Danzig's exit from the LDS Church

LDS Church Releases statement about article written by the Salt Lake Tribune
SALT LAKE CITY 24 February 2008

Church leaders are always saddened when an individual, whether through his or her actions or personal choices, decides to leave the Church. A welcoming hand of fellowship is always extended to those who wish to return at anytime.

Every organization, religious or secular, has to determine where its boundaries begin and where they end. The Apostle Paul said that the original Church was organized to help members to be “no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine.” (Ephesians 4:14)

Members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are encouraged to study, learn and ask questions in their quest for knowledge. Gordon B. Hinckley, 15th president of the Church said: “This Church came about as a result of intellectual curiosity. We believe in education … we expect them (Church members) to think. We expect them to investigate. We expect them to use their minds and dig deeply for knowledge in all fields.”

However, it is not acceptable when their digging and questioning leads to public opposition against doctrine Church leaders are obliged to uphold. That doesn’t mean that Church leaders don’t listen and consider opposing views. Quite the contrary. Local bishops and stake presidents (congregational leaders) love and are concerned about all members of the flock. This is the purpose of counseling provided by local Church leaders who know and care for each individual in their congregations.

Honest disagreements are not the same as public advocacy of positions contrary to those of the Church. When disagreements arise, the principle of the Church is that local leaders discuss these matters with members with love and concern. This was the case with Peter Danzig.
On 23 February 2008 The Salt Lake Tribune posted an article about Mr. Danzig who was a member of the Church’s Orchestra at Temple Square. According to the story, in June of 2006 Mr. Danzig published a letter-to-the-editor in the Tribune (and letters in other local newspapers) encouraging members to oppose Church leaders on the issue of same gender marriage.

In his Tribune letter-to-the-editor, Mr. Danzig said he “was troubled that my church requested I violate my own conscience to write in support of an amendment I feel is contrary to the constitution and to the gospel of Christ." In reality Church leaders had asked members to write to their senators with their personal views regarding the federal amendment opposing same gender marriage, and did not request support or opposition to the amendment.

Initially Orchestra leaders met with Mr. Danzig to see if his public advocacy of this issue could be reconciled. Finding no resolution, they contacted the Office of the First Presidency, and were instructed to refer the matter to Mr. Danzig’s local Church leaders, as Church protocol requires. Mr. Danzig was asked to take a leave of absence from the orchestra until the matter had been resolved.

For more than a year and a half, Mr. Danzig counseled with his local bishop and stake president regarding same gender marriage and other Church doctrines. Unfortunately he was not able to reconcile his personal beliefs with the doctrine Church leaders are charged to maintain by divine mandate.

In December 2007, Mr. Danzig voluntarily withdrew his membership in the Church by his own formal written request. He was not officially disciplined by the Church as the Tribune article indicated.

The Church normally keeps this type of communication confidential. However, the Church felt compelled to defend its position when Mr. Danzig made this information public and because of the blatant, inappropriate editorializing by the Salt Lake Tribune in what was purported to be a news story.

You can read the Salt Lake Tribune article here.

1 comment:

appreciable said...

One of the most interesting things about this article to me is the most central issue in this situation. The article reads, “For more than a year and a half, Mr. Danzig counseled with his local bishop and stake president regarding same gender marriage and other Church doctrines. Unfortunately he was not able to reconcile his personal beliefs with the doctrine Church leaders are charged to maintain by divine mandate.” The real question is whether or not LDS Church leaders have a divine mandate to safeguard doctrines regarding marriage. If I try to imagine things from an outsiders perspective I would say that if I believe in God and believe that this divine being has given a divine mandate to LDS Church leaders to protect the doctrines surrounding the marriage of one man and one woman, I would certainly want them to protect those doctrines. If, on the other hand, I did not believe in God or did not believe that God has given any mandate to LDS Church Leaders I would assume that Mr. Danzig had made the right decision to part with the Church if he did not like the doctrine they were promoting.

Speaking from my perspective now, I wish to say that I believe in having a respectful dialogue about same-gender attraction issues. I therefore respectfully say that it is my belief that God only recognizes marriages between men and women. I believe that God has never and will never recognize a marriage between a man and a man or a woman and a woman. Regardless of what the laws of the land indicate to be right or wrong, I believe that Sexual contact between those of the same gender will always be a sin in the eyes of God and will always lead to inner conflict and unhappiness in the hearts and lives of those participating in such relationships.